Back • Home • Next

Rationally Speaking

A monthly column on skepticism, humanism, science and pseudoscience


by

Massimo Pigliucci



Massimo's
monthly e-column ran from August 2000 to July 2005.
It is now an interactive blog hosted by
www.blogger.com

This website has now become a
Tumblr Blog
- follow it and never miss an update!
Subscribe

 

Rethinking IQ: The rise of ‘rational intelligence’

Our conceptions of intelligence certainly aren’t what they used to be—and they’re continuing to evolve.

Instititute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies
February 01, 2009

Prior to the advent of computers it was thought that number crunching and pure logic was the penultimate measure of intelligence. But after the invention of the calculator, which could suddenly do math thousands of times better than we ever could, we were forced to shift our definitions of intelligence to other seemingly more intractable cognitive functions.

These days a number of psychologists have gone even further by de-emphasizing the importance of IQ tests altogether. Instead, they talk about “supracognitive” characteristics—theories about emotional and social intelligence, which weigh interpersonal skills and the ability to empathize. These cognitive abilities are now typically placed alongside other ‘harder’ measures of intelligence.

Now add to this list what Keith E. Stanovich calls ‘rational intelligence.’ Stanovich, author of What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought, believes that the concept of intelligence, as measured by IQ tests, fails to capture key aspects of mental ability.

That said, he doesn’t discount the tests’ credibility: “Readers might well expect me to say that IQ tests do not measure anything important, or that there are many kinds of intelligence, or that all people are intelligent in their own way,” he writes.

Rather, Stanovich suggests that IQ tests should be adjusted to focus on valuable qualities and capacities that are highly relevant to our daily lives. He argues that IQ tests would be far more effective if they took into account not only mental “brightness” but also rationality — including such abilities as “judicious decision making, efficient behavioral regulation, sensible goal prioritization ... [and] the proper calibration of evidence.”

Stanovich believes that our conceptions of intelligence are confused and that we’ve conflated the whole idea of “smarts.” IQ tests, he argues, do not measure the rationality required to abstain from dumb decisions. But in practical life, we define intelligence more broadly and look out for these kinds of rational weaknesses: “Blatantly irrational acts committed by people of obvious intelligence ... shock and surprise us and call out for explanation.”

And as long as we continue to worship IQ tests that do not assess rational thought processes, warns Stanovich, we will continue to misjudge our own and others’ cognitive abilities.


OK, I changed my mind (three times!) (Jul 2005)
 
On Holy books (Jun 2005)
 
Habemus Papa! (May 2005)
 
Useless feats (Apr 2005)
 
And they say liberals are whiny! (Mar 2005)
 
God did it, or did He? (Feb 2005)
 
Nonsense on stilts, an example (Jan 2005)
 
Dude, this is your country! (Dec 2004)
 
I, robot (Nov 2004)
 
Abortion, a philosophical approach (Oct 2004)
 
Monty Python's guide to Philosophy (Sep 2004)
 
Changing our mind: a Bayesian approach (Aug 2004)
 
The Neurobiology of Regret (Jul 2004)
 
Soldiers' Morality (Jun 2004)
 
Liberal vs. illiberal democracy (May 2004)
 
Intellectual midwifery (Apr 2004)
 
Open letter to Colin Powell (Mar 2004)
 
What's Wrong with the Palestinians? (Feb 2004)
 
On tolerance vs. respect (Jan 2004)
 
Israel, anti-semitism, and world peace (Dec 2003)
 
Edward Teller, Dr. Strangelove (Nov 2003)
 
Bush, the Pope, and gay rights (Oct 2003)
 
Are you a bright? (Sep 2003)
 
Are we afraid of the wrong things? (Aug 2003)
 
Why skeptic doesn't mean cynic (Jul 2003)
 
It's the fundamentalism, stupid!  (Jun 2003)
 
On "being proud of"  (May 2003)
 
Whence Animal Rights?  (Apr 2003)
 
America, Europe, and the rest of the world  (Mar 2003)
 
Gays, in the Military and Outside of It  (Feb 2003)
 
Human instincts and virtue ethics  (Jan 2003)
 
What do you mean, "Rationally Speaking"? (Dec 2002)
 
Is the US the ultimate rogue nation?  (Nov 2002)
 
On intuition  (Oct 2002)
 
Why bother? - Why being liberal is not a lost cause  (Sep 2002)
 
Is God in your brain?  (Aug 2002)
 
Economic vs. Social health: its not the economy, stupid!  (Jul 2002)
 
Ecology vs. Ecophily: Is it good to lie for the environment?   (Jun 2002)
 
The meaning of life (sort of...)   (May 2002)
 
Those who understand Bin Laden  (Apr 2002)
 
Darwin who?  (Mar 2002)
 
Is Philosophy Useless?  (Feb 2002)
 
Mr. Bayes and the true nature of scientific hypotheses  (Jan 2002)
 
The Great Unicorn Debate  (Dec 2001)
 
Beer and circus in American education  (Nov 2001)
Pars destruens      Pars construens                  

 
Heart disease and the myth of individual responsibility  (Oct 2001)
 
"Of Terror And Insanity"  (SPECIAL EDITION)
 
"The dark side of philosophy" (pizza & philosophy series)  (Sep 2001)
 
"Frankenfoods vs. the neo-Luddites"  (Aug 2001)
 
"The Wedge: what happens when science is taken over by ideology?" (July 2001)
 
"God on the Highway" (June 2001)
 
"The Many Faces of Anti-intellectualism" (May 2001)
 
"Red or Blue? What kind of life would you choose?" (Apr 2001)
 
Game Theory, Rational Egoism and the Evolution of Fairness (Mar 2001)
 
The Greatest Democracy in the World and the Unfairness of American Elections (Feb 2001)
 
Split-brains, Paradigm Shifts and Why it is So Difficult to be a Skeptic (Jan 2001)
 
Intelligent Design - the Modern Argument (Dec 2000)
 
Intelligent Design - the Classical Argument (Nov 2000)
 
Whence Natural Rights? - A Dialogue (Oct 2000)
 
The Place of Science (Sep 2000)
 
The Rationalistic Fallacy (Aug 2000)