|
"As things stand we BIG members don't get a huge
amount of recognition or official encouragement, do we?
In one sense, it's probably better this way because those who do this work
for love do it better than those who do it for money. Relatively little of
the British tidal wave of Millennium science centre spending found its way
to our pockets, did it? I was grateful for a nice Millennium grant for a
new Blown-up Biology show, which helped and encouraged me immensely. The
recognition encouraged me as much as the money.
But most of the spending went on "packaging" and "packaging specialists"
(architects and visitor-attraction-designers and marketing) rather than on
phenomenon-centred content and phenomenon-centred wondersmiths. And now the
consultants are scratching their heads and tutting over business plans and
financial models and marketing (I heard them at the ECSITE Conference) and
STILL overlooking the missing factor, for which people vote with their feet"
BIG Chat comment
19/12/03
|
 |