| Female
Behaviour Pre-programmed by Evolution |
| |
| |
Curvy women are cleverer too
It was already known that men find curvy women more
attractive and that they live longer. Now research suggests that women with
an hourglass figure are brighter and have cleverer children, too.
TimesOnline
Nov 2007
The study found that women with large hips and small waists are more
intelligent than those with either apple-shaped or linear bodies.
The paper, to be published in the journal Evolution and Human Behaviour this
week, suggests that such women give birth to more intelligent children -
possibly a result of higher levels of omega3 fatty acids on the hips.
The researchers believe that the results offer a new explanation for why
many men find curvy women more alluring. Nigella Lawson, the cookery
presenter and Oxford University graduate, has one of Britains most famous
hourglass figures, while Rachel Weisz, the curvy actress who won an Oscar
for her role in The Constant Gardener, completed an English degree at
Cambridge University while embarking on the first stages of her acting
career.
In the research, scientists at the Universities of Pittsburgh and
California, Santa Barbara, used data from a study of 16,000 women and girls,
which collected details of their body measurements and their scores in
cognitive tests. They found that those women with a greater difference
between the waist and hips scored significantly higher on the tests, as did
their children.
Such women are not necessarily skinny. What is important is that their waist
should be smaller than their hips, with the ideal ratio being between 0.6
and 0.7.
The researchers suggest that the fat around fuller hips and thighs holds
higher levels of omega3 fatty acids which are essential for the growth of
the brain during pregnancy. Fat around the waist may have higher levels of
omega6 fatty acids, which are less suited to brain growth.
Waist fat can also be a contributory factor in diabetes and heart disease.
Thinner or linear-shaped women would simply lack enough of either type of
fat.
Although these theories await confirmation, Paula Hall, a sexual and
relationship psychologist with Relate, said: Having research that proves
you can be sexy and intelligent is really positive. It shows that curvy
women may be better at things other than raising children and doing cooking
and housework.
The research may also explain why children born to teenage mothers do worse
in cognitive tests: their mothers may have had insufficient stores of the
best fatty acids.
The cognitive development of their children is reduced, and their own
cognitive development is impaired compared with those mothers with a later
first birth, say the researchers.
The study noted, however, that children born to teenage girls with
traditional hourglass figures seemed to be protected from this phenomenon
and did better in tests.
A number of scientific studies have shown that men are hard-wired to find
women with a greater waist-hip differential the most attractive. No one has
yet been able to explain this, although theories include enhanced fertility,
better childbearing abilities and longer life expectancy.
Dr Harry Witchel, a senior lecturer in physiology at the Brighton and Sussex
Medical School and a body language expert on the television programme Big
Brother, said: Until this point the only thing we have accepted is that
they [curvy women] are at an advantage in contemporary western society. What
these people are saying is that they also have an advantage biologically.
|
'Hormonal' women most attractive
Women with high levels of the sex hormone oestrogen have
prettier faces, research suggests.
BBC News
Nov 2005
The findings make evolutionary sense - men are attracted to the most fertile
women, the University of St Andrews team told a Royal Society journal.
Oestrogen levels during puberty can impact on appearance by affecting bone
growth and skin texture, they said.
But make-up masks this effect, allowing less attractive women to compensate
for their lack of natural mating cues.
It makes sense for men to favour feminine fertile women - those that did
would have had more babies
Psychologist Miriam Law Smith
The team of psychologists at the University's Perception Lab photographed 59
young women's faces aged between 18 and 25 and analysed their sex hormone
levels.
They then asked 30 volunteers - 15 male and 15 female - to rate the faces
according to attractiveness.
Both male and female volunteers rated the faces of the women with the
highest hormone levels as the most attractive.
Feminine features
These faces tended to have classically feminine features, such as larger
eyes and lips and smaller noses and jaws.
However, when the women in the photographs were wearing make-up, no
relationship between attractiveness and oestrogen was found.
The researchers believe that, while make-up improves facial appearance, it
may be masking cues normally seen in the face.
Women are employing a deceptive strategy. They can fool the male visual
system with make-up
Dr Tony Little from Liverpool University
Head of the study, Miriam Law Smith, said: "Women are effectively
advertising their general fertility with their faces.
"Make-up can improve appearance across the board, but it will obviously help
people who are less attractive more."
For example, eye make-up can be used to make the eyes appear bigger and
foundation can make the skin look clearer.
"Our findings could explain why men universally seem to prefer feminine
women's faces.
"In evolutionary terms, it makes sense for men to favour feminine fertile
women - those that did would have had more babies," she added.
Dr Tony Little, a lecturer in the School of Biological Sciences at the
University of Liverpool, said: "It's a very interesting study.
"The findings make sense. There are clear benefits to choosing particular
types of female faces. Oestrogen is related to fertility.
"The findings about make-up are also interesting. The implication is that
women are employing a deceptive strategy. They can fool the male visual
system with make-up."
He said his studies with co-worker Craig Roberts showed female
attractiveness also fluctuated throughout the menstrual cycle, peaking at a
woman's most fertile days.
|
'Menstrual' brain changes seen
Women use their brains differently at different times of the
month, research suggests.
BBC News
25 Oct 2005
Brain scans revealed mental processes can change across the menstrual cycle.
Just before a period, at the time when some women experience premenstrual
syndrome, activity in brain regions that help control emotions increased.
After menstruation the activity went down, a US team from New York told
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Cyclical changes
Although the researchers looked at 12 women with no outward menstrual mood
changes, they say their findings could be important for understanding why
some women have a particularly hard emotional time around menstruation.
PMS is believed to affect between one-third and one-half of women between
20-50 years of age.
Women with PMS may experience depression, irritability and a propensity
towards outbursts of anger as well as physical symptoms such as cramps and
bloating.
It confirms that the psychological health of women patients must be assessed
in relationship to the menstrual cycle
Chris Ryan of the National Association for Premenstrual Syndrome
In the study, Dr Emily Stern of Cornell University, along with colleagues
from the Rockefeller University, used MRI scans to monitor the brain
activity patterns of women as they were asked to read words with negative,
neutral or positive connotations.
The 12 women were asked to perform the same task premenstrually - one to
five days before their period was due - and then postmenstrually - eight to
12 days after their period.
Premenstrual syndrome
During the premenstrual phase the women showed much greater activity in
frontal brain regions that help control emotions when they were reading the
emotive words.
Postmenstrually, this increased brain activity had disappeared.
The researchers say it is possible that the brain changes might have allowed
the women to maintain a consistent emotional state and compensate for the
surging hormones that occur around menstruation, which some suggest are
involved in PMS.
It might be that women who experience particularly severe emotional symptoms
as part of PMS lose this control.
They plan to test this by looking at women with premenstrual dysphoric
disorder (PMDD) - an extreme form of PMS.
They also suggested that doctors consider what phase of the menstrual cycle
a woman is in when trying to interpret any brain scan results.
Chris Ryan, chief executive of the National Association for Premenstrual
Syndrome, said: "This study, although of a small sample, adds to the
compelling evidence that the menstrual cycle is a key factor affecting the
psychological well-being of women of reproductive age.
"It confirms that the psychological health of women patients must be
assessed in relationship to the menstrual cycle."
|
Fertile women rate other women as uglier
Women judge the attractiveness other women more harshly when at their most
fertile, suggests a new study. The phenomenon could be a strategy to devalue
potential rivals, says the psychologist behind the work - being bitchy about
others could help a woman win the attention of a desirable man.
18 February 04
NewScientist.com news service
Theories of sexual selection in most species usually concentrate on how
males compete for females. But recent theories for humans suggest there is
intrasexual competition among females as well, as males can vary markedly in
their abilities as providers and protectors.
Maryanne Fisher, a psychologist at York University in Toronto, Canada,
decided to try to find evidence for female competition by presenting
heterosexual students with photos of faces. She found that when women were
in the most fertile phase of their menstrual cycles, they rated the
attractiveness of other women lower than when they were not.
"Often women are characterised as being very co-operative, very kind-hearted
and not competing directly," Fisher told New Scientist. "But there's been a
fair bit of work on how women are indirectly aggressive."
For example, she says: "Rather than saying 'I'm going to beat that woman up
because she looked at you', it's 'Oh my goodness, look how fat her ankles
are'!"
Caring or rugged
Being more combative during a fertile period backs the idea that women are
competing for the best mate. "When you're in a high fertility phase, you
have to be more able to judge other women as potential rivals," says Fisher.
David Perrett, an expert on facial perception at St Andrew's University, UK,
says: "It's a very interesting finding. This is the first study I know of to
find attitudes to female faces changing [with the menstrual cycle]."
Perrett's group previously found that women preferred more feminine, caring
looking men for most of the month, but preferred more rugged, dominant
looking types during the most fertile phase of their cycle.
In contrast, the women's attitudes towards male faces did not appear to vary
with the menstrual cycle in this new study.
Neutral expression
The 57 female students tested, along with male controls, were asked to look
at colour photos of 35 female and 30 male faces. The models for the photos
were asked to display a neutral facial expression, wear a black smock and
remove any accessories to help standardise the experiment.
Women with high estrogen levels, in days 12 to 21 of their menstrual cycle,
rated other women's attractiveness significantly lower than women in a less
fertile, low estrogen period of their cycle.
Fisher does not know exactly how women's heightened sense of competition
during ovulation may help them win a mate. "Does putting someone down make
you feel better about yourself? Or does saying it to a male make her less
attractive to him?" she asks.
She adds that this kind of intrasexual competition could also carry risks -
being too bitchy could make a woman look " mean-spirited" to a man. To
answer these questions, Fisher is now investigating how men's attitudes are
affected by women using such derogatory tactics.
Ben Jones, a psychologist working with Perrett at St Andrew's, points out
that Fisher's results may not necessarily reflect simple derogatory tactics.
Previous research has shown that women also rate their own attractiveness as
higher when their fertility is high.
"Indeed, the fluctuations in women's perception of their own attractiveness
may reflect real physical changes caused by estrogen, for example lip
colouration and fullness," he says. "So the women may be objectively correct
in seeing others as less attractive."
Journal reference: Biology Letters (DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0160)
Shaoni Bhattacharya
|
What do women really want in bed?
Nikki Gemmell on why complete sexual honesty is something
very few people can cope with
July 10, 2003
Guardian
George Orwell listed four writers' motives: sheer egotism, aesthetic
enthusiasm, historical impulse (the desire to record things as they are, for
posterity) and political purpose (the desire to push the world in a certain
direction). I have a much simpler reason for writing: to be in control. As a
wife and a mother, as a woman, my desk is the only place where I have
complete control in my life. It is also, ironically, the only pocket of my
life where I can be utterly truthful - especially in terms of sex.
It is hard, in a relationship, to be completely honest: to show your partner
your secret self. Vita Sackville West described herself as an iceberg, and
said her husband could only see what was above the water's surface. She
speculated it was the reason their marriage worked. What relationship can
survive the harshness of absolute candour?
I can't stand giving blow jobs, but I have never said that to a lover; for
years I have dutifully kneeled. Many girlfriends feel the same. One
describes it as a chore in the same way she describes defrosting the fridge.
Yet, of course, she has never told her husband this.
Why is it still so hard for women, basking in the glow of so many feminist
advances, to be more honest about sex? To say such simple things to their
sexual partners as: "No, I didn't have an orgasm." Or, "I find it incredibly
monotonous when you make love to me, and sometimes it hurts."
Why are women still so subservient to their partner's pleasure at the
expense of their own? Why aren't we more in control? Because we don't want
them to turn away from us, perhaps. We don't want them to find the woman who
loves giving blow jobs (yes, they do exist). Because we want our partners to
think we are someone else. Because sometimes we are willing to put up with a
lot, to keep a relationship steady, to have children.
Is complete sexual honesty the last frontier that feminism has to tackle?
I loved the idea of diving under the surface of a woman's life, a seemingly
contentedly-married woman, and exploring her secret world. In my book I
wanted to say all those things we may think, but never actually say -
especially to our lovers.
I had fully intended to put my name to The Bride Stripped Bare when I began,
but soon found I was censoring myself: afraid of too much honesty, afraid of
hurting the people closest to me, and afraid that no man - husband included
- would ever want to sleep with me again, knowing that they were being so
judged.
I was judging the dishonesty in my own sexual life most of all. The aim was
to be as merciless in print as a Chuck Close painting or a Ron Mueck
sculpture - but as far as I know, those artists do not often turn their
extremely critical eye upon themselves. Now I know why. I am not someone who
is completely relaxed about nudity, have never been comfortable in a bikini.
And like many women in a swimsuit, I'm afraid of revealing too much.
But when the idea of anonymity came to me, everything clicked. I was
suddenly like a woman on a foreign beach who is confident that she doesn't
know a soul and parades her body loudly and joyously, without worrying what
anyone thinks of her. I had opened a door to a reckless, exhilarating new
world, and could say whatever I wanted.
Like, I have never climaxed during vaginal sex. And I was 30 before I had my
first orgasm and I have lied, often, about whether I have had one. And I am
often thinking of another scenario entirely as I am being made love to, that
has nothing to do with the man inside me. And for years I wasn't sure I was
going about it the right way, because I was getting so little from the
experience. And it was such a relief to read that Marilyn Monroe had said,
"I don't think I do it properly."
What's all this about big penises? I would much prefer a snug fit than one
that makes me feel that I am being split apart. And, actually, I really
don't like my breasts being fondled and a lot of women I know feel the same.
Anonymity gave me the freedom to voice, for the first time, exactly what I
wanted when it came to sex. I found the freedom to vent all those doubts I
had felt for so long - and to write about a woman finding a way to be in
sexual control. Finding a way to have exhilarating sex, the kind that can
transport you to another plane. I wasn't sure, though, that I wanted my
husband to know of this woman. I'm seen as a good, sweet wife. I didn't want
to let him down.
Naively, perhaps, I thought I could get away with it: no one would know it
was me behind the book. It also meant I wasn't afraid of it failing. It
seemed such a strange hybrid of novel, memoir, treatise and sex manual; I
wasn't sure it worked. I was a very new mother, and I had lost my
professional confidence. I was exhausted, and my brain didn't work in the
way it used to.
Then the story broke about the authorship, just after the book had been sold
to its publisher. Suddenly I lost control; journalists were camping on my
doorstep and doorstepping my husband (to this day my publishers, agent and
myself don't know how they found out).
I couldn't lie about the its authorship, for Bride, above all, was about
honesty. One reader wrote, "I would never have had the courage to have said
what you did - it's so raw, so open. You're very brave." I laughed when I
received this, for, of course, I would never have had the courage to say
what I did either if I had thought my name would be attached.
I still have my husband to deal with. He has just read my book. We haven't
made love since, because he is feeling raw and vulnerable. But also, I must
say, more than a little turned on.
I hope the book works; I hope honesty works. I don't know yet, it is too
early. I am not sure if our relationship can survive the spotlight of so
much frankness. Perhaps I would need to read his side of the story: a man's
secret life. To know what he really wants from sex, but has never dared say.
At least to his wife.
The Bride Stripped Bare, by Anonymous, is published by Fourth Estate, 15.
|

|